https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30106
--- Comment #5 from Neil Kandalgaonkar <[email protected]> 2011-07-28 23:31:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > MediaWiki is under "GPL v2 or later", so it's actually quite fine to write a > > GPLv3 extension I would imagine... it just means that the combination when > > you > > load them together is forced to GPLv3 as well. > > Okay, RobLa and I just talked about this in person, and I think I understand > it > now. So we don't mind being open to GPLv3, in the sense that someone could > write an extension that was GPLv3, and then the combination of MediaWiki plus > that extension would be GPLv3. > > However, as a matter of WMF policy, is it correct to assume that everyone who > works for us should be writing GPLv2 That is, GPL v2 or greater. Jeroen wants to abbreviate this as "@license GPL v2+"; I don't know if that actually has any meaning though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
