https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29907
Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|Normal |Unprioritized CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> 2011-08-13 09:30:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I've added a few comments about stuff that is/isn't cached. > > Per Aaron, arbitary text passed by the user isn't (should it?) cached. > > Neither are parses of old page text. Should we maybe be caching them incase > they are getting multiple hits? > > Also, neither are section parses, should we be saving those? Are they common? > > Hopefully Tim can weigh in here, and suggest the way forward - if we should, > or > shouldn't be caching other stuff... It sounds like action=parse has the same caching behavior as 'normal' MW then. I should admit that I filed this bug report solely based on a statement by Tim without verifying it myself. Maybe Tim's statement was based on old behavior that has since been fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
