https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29907
--- Comment #8 from Reedy <[email protected]> 2011-08-13 11:36:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I've added a few comments about stuff that is/isn't cached. > > > > Per Aaron, arbitary text passed by the user isn't (should it?) cached. > > > > Neither are parses of old page text. Should we maybe be caching them incase > > they are getting multiple hits? > > > > Also, neither are section parses, should we be saving those? Are they > > common? > > > > Hopefully Tim can weigh in here, and suggest the way forward - if we > > should, or > > shouldn't be caching other stuff... > It sounds like action=parse has the same caching behavior as 'normal' MW then. > I should admit that I filed this bug report solely based on a statement by Tim > without verifying it myself. Maybe Tim's statement was based on old behavior > that has since been fixed? I know during some bits of refactoring to fix other bugs, I believe I added methods that use the parser cache in a place or 2.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
