https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
--- Comment #52 from Neil Kandalgaonkar <[email protected]> 2011-10-16 22:55:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #51) > (In reply to comment #45) > > Well, you are all commenting on related issues, but as for Flickr (...) > > they don't do EXIF rotation at all, and EXIF metadata is entirely stripped > > from all scaled images. > > There are images in flickr where the file is rotated according to the EXIF. > I.e. the thumbs look right, but the original image (as provided by flickr) is > rotated with EXIF rotation metadata. > > A couple of instances: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/igorgm/6073292209/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/igorgm/6073985274/ That was puzzling -- I tried it myself with the test image Brion was using in the unit tests. Orientation is 270, and yet the image remains unrotated: http://www.flickr.com/photos/brevity/6221434141/meta/in/photostream/ This is a guess, but the other image uses the Canon EXIF Tag "Auto Rotate". http://www.flickr.com/photos/igorgm/6073292209/meta/in/photostream/ ...which my usual EXIF parsing tool (exiv2) can't even read or write, so that's hard to test. Maybe Flickr decided that Orientation was unreliable, but maybe Canon's AutoRotate is. I'll ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
