https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30401

Krinkle <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #15 from Krinkle <[email protected]> 2011-10-23 23:28:58 UTC ---
I'm gonna suggest WONTFIX. I see no practical nor theoretical point in offering
a user an option to enable or disable animations. These are things to be
considered generally as part of the interface design.

The last thing I wanna see happen is situations where developers need to debug
scripts with animations on and off. There are way too many "I want preferences"
preferences already, this is not going to be one of them.

If animations are lagging, then the 'right' solution (in my opinion) is to not
have animations in that case, the wrong solution would be to offer a way to
manually disable them. users shouldn't have to care nor be aware of this.

If they're working smooth and fast and not annoying, then it's okay to have
them in a sudle way where possible (like with the ajax watch/unwatch
notification, those would imho be jumpy/annoying without an animation).

See bug 31832  for progress on fixing the lagging in the animation, making it
animationless in environments where it would lag otherwise.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to