| Krinkle added a comment. |
In T197616#4461712, @daniel wrote:Do you believe that the test wikis on the live cluster should be removed [..]
Yes and no.
Yes, I'd prefer we not see test-wikis as ways to catch regressions during normal deployments, because almost none of our procedures (apart from train/group0) include test wikis. And for train/group0 we have other wikis that serve this purpose better, e.g. www.mediawiki.org. I don't see this as a problem because test wikis are in production, that's too late for testing. At this point, we might as well perform QA against an actual production wiki that doesn't have different or dated configuration.
No, I'd prefer we keep at least test.wikipedia and test2.wikipedia, for testing with multiversion. This is why, test2.wikipedia is on group2 (or group1?) instead of group0. Although I do think that in the long-term we should phase this out. Especially now that we have a Beta Cluster and X-Wikimedia-Debug. Beta can be used to enable upcoming features before their deployment in prod, and XWD can be used to verify changes in prod during a deployment.
Cc: Ramsey-WMF, Tgr, Anomie, Krinkle, Liuxinyu970226, Jdforrester-WMF, Fjalapeno, Abit, Aklapper, greg, Reedy, CCicalese_WMF, daniel, Lahi, PDrouin-WMF, Gq86, E1presidente, JunaidHafeez, Cparle, BJ6123C7BTD, Anooprao, SandraF_WMF, GoranSMilovanovic, Jayprakash12345, QZanden, Tramullas, Acer, Zoranzoki21, LawExplorer, DatGuy, Devwaker, Niklitov, Urbanecm, Liudvikas, JEumerus, StevenJ81, Susannaanas, Tulsi_Bhagat, Wong128hk, Luke081515, SimmeD, Aschroet, Jane023, Wikidata-bugs, Snowolf, Base, matthiasmullie, aude, Dcljr, Ebe123, Koavf, Ricordisamoa, Lydia_Pintscher, Fabrice_Florin, Raymond, zeljkofilipin, Rschen7754, Steinsplitter, Matanya, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Krenair
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
