| Pablo-WMDE added a comment. |
@JeroenDeDauw wrote
The premise here is that there are costs to having the EntityId in statement GUIDs. Such as not being able to require that each statement has a GUID.
This raises the question: can we get away with dropping the EntityId from statement GUIDs?
I am not aware of any places where we rely on the EntityId bit in the GUID string. Since the GUIDs are part of several public interfaces, usage outside Wikibase should also be considered.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Pablo-WMDE
Cc: Aklapper, Addshore, JeroenDeDauw, Pablo-WMDE, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: Aklapper, Addshore, JeroenDeDauw, Pablo-WMDE, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
