akosiaris added a comment.
In T199219#5234041 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T199219#5234041>, @Smalyshev wrote: > There's a change though that WDQS no longer uses `nocache` for cache-busting in most common cases (see T217897 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217897> for more details). So I am not sure using internal endpoint now makes sense. It's not just about caches though. It's also about easier service level operations, e.g. switchover between DCs becomes easier and less error prone if the internal endpoint is used instead of the external one. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T199219 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: akosiaris Cc: akosiaris, BBlack, Aklapper, Smalyshev, Gehel, darthmon_wmde, Premeditated, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
