daniel added a comment.
In T214362#5284886 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362#5284886>, @Marostegui wrote: > Just a quick question: "this would fit a generalized parser cache mechanism" meaning it would fit into the existing parsercache mechanism (and infrastructure) or is that still to be defined? It doesn't fit the current mechanism, since we would need an additional key (or key suffix). The infrastructure for the new generalized cache is not yet defined. It would cover the functionality of the current parser cache (Memcached+SQL) and the Parsoid cache (currently Cassandra). It's not yet clear which of the two the unified mechanism would use, or if it should use something else entirely. So far, the generalized parser cache is just an idea. There is no plan yet. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: daniel Cc: abian, Lydia_Pintscher, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Marostegui, Joe, daniel, Agabi10, Aklapper, Addshore, darthmon_wmde, Nandana, kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, D3r1ck01, Pchelolo, SBisson, Eevans, mobrovac, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Ladsgroup, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
