dbarratt added a comment.
In T237472#5649298 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T237472#5649298>, @Lydia_Pintscher wrote: > Removing campsite as this is not something the team will work on without further thought and discussion. okie dokie. > What's the underlying problem we're trying to solve? Knowing completeness of a certain part of Wikidata's data? Based on the discussion <https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Project_chat&oldid=1048248407#Completeness_of_Lists> that seems to be the thing that keeps coming up, and the work-arounds (described in the task) seem somewhat "hacky." As someone pointed out: "dedicated duplicated properties, one different for each base property, and without apparent relationship to their base version." There are a lot of different ways that "completeness" can be expressed depending on the property and what it is being used on. I suppose the community could create a generic property and qualify the statements with the property that is of concern, but that feels like another hacky solution. :/ There might be other statements that should be expressed about a //statement group// but I'm not sure what those would be. I wanted to ensure that this problem was documented somewhere. :) TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T237472 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: dbarratt Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, dbarratt, darthmon_wmde, DannyS712, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
