Jc3s5h added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66084#996435, @thiemowmde wrote:
> Uh, what? What about fixing the documentation? It's marked as //"This > document is a draft, and should not be assumed to represent the ultimate > structure"// anyway. > > My original question is, unfortunately, not mentioned in your responses: What > makes you think ISO strictly requires a fixed number of digits? Even if it > //suggests// something like that, who says such a restriction needs to be > uniform across **all** of Wikidata and can't be different for, for example, > different items? I think it's our responsibility to define the borders of > such a restriction and not something an ISO standard dictates, especially > since it **can't** dictate the number of digits anyway. I answered your question on Jan 26, 22:38, UTC. That comment contains a quote from ISO 8601. I suggest that any developer who is consuming or creating data that purports to comply with ISO 8601 should be in possession of that specification and have read it. There is currently a copy available at https://archive.org/details/pdfy-9p5vLWOVotIh-lDV but I'm not sure if that was made available in compliance with copyright laws, so it would be better to purchase a copy from ISO or one of their affiliates in your country. It costs over $100. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66084 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Jc3s5h Cc: thiemowmde, Jc3s5h, Wikidata-bugs, Nemo_bis, Addshore, MZMcBride, Lydia_Pintscher, JohnLewis, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
