daniel added a comment.

  In T233520#5855751 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233520#5855751>, 
@Addshore wrote:
  
  > - updating page_touched would probably trigger a reparse of the page (and 
currently that doesn't happen for the case described)
  
  In practical terms, WikiPageUpdater should probably just call 
WikiPage::doPurge(), instead of trying to duplicate the functionality.
  
  > - Virtual usages comes into play here.
  
  Being connected via sitelink is the original "virtual usage" considered by 
AffectedPagesFinder. We discussed also treating the description from wikidata 
as a virtual usage, since it's visible in the mobile view. Don't remember how 
that played out.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233520

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: daniel
Cc: CCicalese_WMF, Anomie, Petar.petkovic, Zoranzoki21, Tacsipacsi, 
matej_suchanek, Bencemac, Urbanecm, RolandUnger, alaa_wmde, Ladsgroup, 
Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, LibrErli, Krinkle, daniel, tstarling, aaron, WMDE-leszek, 
Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Jheald, Aklapper, Mike_Peel, 
darthmon_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, 
Poyekhali, _jensen, rosalieper, Taiwania_Justo, Scott_WUaS, Pchelolo, Jonas, 
Ixocactus, Wong128hk, Wikidata-bugs, aude, El_Grafo, Dinoguy1000, 
Steinsplitter, Mbch331, Keegan
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to