Smalyshev added a comment. @Thompsonbry.systap I've heard from the other people with RDF experience in previous conversations that RDF reification is deprecated and/or discouraged. That also brings me to the question - can the model that is not RDF reification (i.e. using rdf:* predicates) but still looks somewhat like it be theoretically understood by Blazegraph (maybe with some help from plugins etc.) and benefit from "more efficient indexing"?
> In fact, you should not care how the database is indexing the data - that is > the whole point of having a physical/logical abstraction and a declarative > query language. My experience with SQL suggests that while it is a noble goal, as the data volumes raise it becomes much more theoretical than practical - i.e. in practice you have to care how your data looks like if you want big queries finish in reasonable time. Not sure what is the situation in RDF/SPARQL world with that, but that's the source of my concerns. Along with the extent of "more efficient" indexing - it might be useful to somehow see how large is the improvement there. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90952 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Smalyshev Cc: Haasepeter, Thompsonbry.systap, Beebs.systap, Manybubbles, Aklapper, Smalyshev, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke, daniel, JanZerebecki _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
