Thompsonbry.systap added a comment.

That is a good point. This can (and should) be fixed.

As long as the scope of the document is reasonable (think wiki page), then
there is no significant overhead incurred by resolving reified statement
models.  However this could be a problem if all the data was dumped into a
single file in a scattered ordering since we might have to buffer a lot of
data. But I think it should be easy enough for you to dump the data such
that the resolution scope is local.

Also, this is just a function of the syntax used to interchange the data.
From this perspective, the RDR syntax is just sugar that makes it easier on
the parser (or on the eyes of a person writing the data).

Bryan


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90952

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
<username>.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Thompsonbry.systap
Cc: Haasepeter, Thompsonbry.systap, Beebs.systap, Manybubbles, Aklapper, 
Smalyshev, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke, daniel, JanZerebecki



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to