Amire80 added a comment.
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation! The languages are clearly legitimate, but I'm not entirely sure what to do about the scripts here. For what it's worth, there's a bit of content in both of them in the Incubator, in their own scripts. If at the moment no particular person is actually planning to add written lexemes in them, and codes are only used for linking between languages, it makes sense to me to simply add `ccp` and `rhg`. When anyone actually wants to add written content, adjustments can be made if needed. Did I misunderstand anything? Does anyone have another opinion? > (It's interesting that these questions were not also asked of T271589 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T271589>.) That's because there isn't much to say about those languages' writing systems. I guess there is some variation there, too, but it appears clear that they are mostly written in the Bengali script (but do correct me if I'm wrong). TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T272442 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Amire80 Cc: Mbch331, jhsoby, Amire80, Mahir256, Aklapper, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Nikki, Wikidata-bugs, aude
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
