Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment.
>> So maybe the only thing left to do is to make the warning more quiet so it doesn’t pollute production logstash? (I think “notice” log level would be appropriate: “normal, but significant, condition”, above “info” but below “warning”.) > > Either that, or we could keep it an error and log it to the Wikibase channel. Because //if// it happens again, then we would surely want to know about it because that means we got invalid data into our DB again and need to do something about it. (Assuming the invalid data currently in the DB gets removed, as talked about elsewhere.) Fair enough. (It would be really cool if we could log this conditionally depending on whether it happens for a recent/latest revision or a historical one, but I don’t think that’s feasible.) TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T285131 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE Cc: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Michael, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Iflorez, alaa_wmde, Nandana, lucamauri, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Addshore, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
