guergana.tzatchkova added a comment.
In T324680#8528582 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T324680#8528582>, @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote: > I looked at the AbuseFilter code a bit, and while filters are cached pretty aggressively (one week), it looks like the cache is supposed to be purged when a filter is edited… I don’t know why that doesn’t seem to be working. > > But it should still be possible to test the new filter, right? Even if an edit gets blocked by #64, we can check in the abuse filter log whether it triggered #64 and #66 or #64 only (Beta Wikidata abuse filter log for global filters #64 and #66 <https://wikidata.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?wpSearchFilter=global-64|global-66>). Yes, it can be tested like that but it makes a bit more difficult. It seems to be working I think. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T324680 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: guergana.tzatchkova Cc: Michael, Lydia_Pintscher, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, connorshea, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
