Lydia_Pintscher added a comment. It is not just about the time of my team. It is about the effort we're putting on the community as well to maintain this information on all items when it is only needed on a very small number of them.
If we're adapting Wikidata's api to also provide a sanitized description or leave it to the client either way we need to have a discussion in the community to agree that "anything in brackets can be stripped" is ok and can be agreed upon as an editing standard. I'm happy to do that. Which of those two to chose for me depends on if we believe most clients will need the stripped version or if they don't care. I don't know to be honest. The biggest usecase of descriptions for 3rd parties is tagging and there you'd want the full descriptions. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97566 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lydia_Pintscher Cc: Jdforrester-WMF, Pigsonthewing, Tfinc, Deskana, Mhurd, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, kaldari, Wikidata-bugs, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
