JanZerebecki added a comment.

Copying from https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/234291/ :
Daniel Kinzler:

> I'd prefer something that is less ad-hoc than this. Perhaps we could use 
> Symfony's CSS selector implementation 
> http://symfony.com/doc/current/components/css_selector.html (and skip the 
> test if the component is missing).

> 

> But I agree with Thiemo that we should rather replace assertTag with simple 
> assertContains and *simply* assertRegex calls, where possible.


Ricordisamoa:

> How are regular expressions not ad-hoc? Are you sure it's really worth it to 
> use complicated and fragile patterns that must take into account the order of 
> attributes, nested nodes, different quote styles etc. whereas with a few 
> dozens of LOCs you can leverage a real (X|HT)ML parser using a syntax that is 
> both clear and extensible as seen in SpecialModifyTermTestCase?



TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T69122

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: JanZerebecki
Cc: JanZerebecki, Ricordisamoa, gerritbot, Aklapper, Wikidata-bugs, Bene, 
Tobi_WMDE_SW, JeroenDeDauw, adrianheine, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, aude



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to