kaldari added a comment. > Note btw that "population" is a natural number count but should *not* default > to exact values, but apply the +/-1 rule.
This doesn't make sense to me. A population count is a count, not a measurement. It doesn't have uncertainty. It will never be converted to other units. It may be totally wrong, but that's different than measurement uncertainty/precision. Even if it is an estimate, the estimate is still a specific number, unless an uncertainty is provided. I would strongly argue that a population should be considered an "amount" or "number", rather than a quantity with precision. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68580 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: kaldari Cc: Tobias1984, Aklapper, Jc3s5h, Denny, Stryn, Mbch331, Sjoerddebruin, AmaryllisGardener, Izno, Smalyshev, kaldari, Gareth, Ayack, geraki, Bugreporter, DSGalaktos, Wikidata-bugs, SPQRobin, jayvdb, Snaterlicious, Liuxinyu970226, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
