JanZerebecki added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875#1835587, @Cheetah90 wrote:
> > If the AI ingested everything, this would be solved, right? > > Yes to some extent, since the AI system still have to figure out which are > the correct sub-articles given a main article from all the corpus. Why would it need to? If the information that chocolate contains caffeine is contained in the article "Information that needs to be moved to the correct article" but neither in the Chocolate nor Caffeine article then the AI could extract that information without knowing anything about sub-article relationships. > False positive: main-article Caffeine > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine> sub-article History of Chocolate > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_chocolate> That is not the sub-article relationship the article implies as is, as it omits the sub-article relationship encoded in the headers / table of content of that Article. It says Caffeine -> History of Caffeine -> Discovery and spread of use of Caffeine -> History of chocolate, which seems to fit your definition, thus not a false positive. > A quick question: how often are the wikidata imported back to Wikipedia > articles? When a Wikipedia article uses https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Wikibase_Client#Data_transclusion to display information, after that is edited on Wikidata it will under normal circumstances update after less than a minute. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117875 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lydia_Pintscher, JanZerebecki Cc: Cheetah90, JanZerebecki, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, StudiesWorld, aude, Halfak, Wikidata-bugs, Mbch331 _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
