Ottomata added a comment. Hm, not sure I follow. We are proposing that a schema be ID-able via a URI, and also remotely locatable if that URI happens to be a full URL with schema and domain information. Is the opaqueness issue the fact that it is `<name>/<revision>` that IDs the schema, instead of just a unique `/<schema_id>`?
TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116247 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: mobrovac, Ottomata Cc: RobLa-WMF, Nuria, gerritbot, intracer, EBernhardson, Smalyshev, yuvipanda, Hardikj, daniel, aaron, GWicke, mobrovac, MZMcBride, bd808, JanZerebecki, Halfak, Krenair, brion, chasemp, Eevans, mmodell, Ottomata, Matanya, Aklapper, JAllemandou, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331, jeremyb _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
