XXN added a comment. @Nikki Are there cases where exists `mo` terms in Latin script, but no `ro` terms? I thinks no, so such mo terms can safely be removed. In any case, anything merged from `mo` to `ro` needs verification by native Romanian speakers.
Are we forced to change these lang. codes right now? I ask because the current proposal for deletion of Moldovan Wikipedia can help us a lot to decide what to do. The normal and expected result of that proposal for deletion is deletion of all `mo` Wikimedia projects and then Wikidata lang code `mo` with all his values can be deleted all at once. There is a //little// problem with moving `mo` terms to `ro-cyrl`: Romanian Cyrillic alphabet was used before 1862 and it is *not the same* as the Moldovan Cyrillic alphabet used between 1924-1989. It's not recommended to do this move. By me, the best way is to wait a decision on proposal for deletion of Moldovan projects. Anyway, until that moment there exists several wikimedia projects with `mo` subdomain lang code and a synchronization between sitelinks code and label-description-alias code is necessary. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125073 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: XXN Cc: XXN, Liuxinyu970226, Nikki, Fomafix, adrianheine, Aklapper, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331 _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
