| Smalyshev added a comment. |
If it's there, it's there because someone put it there.
Possible. But given we have 1/4 to 1/3 of the data like this, and I have super hard time believing they are all exactly precise numbers, and the counts are such that manually reviewing them is out of the question - I think we might have to think about some better solution. I'm not against starting with no-precision and correct-precision ones, that covers 2/3 of the cases, but we should think about the rest 1/3 too.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Smalyshev
Cc: Nikki, PokestarFan, Smalyshev, thiemowmde, Physikerwelt, hoo, daniel, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, StudiesWorld, ArthurPSmith, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: Nikki, PokestarFan, Smalyshev, thiemowmde, Physikerwelt, hoo, daniel, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, StudiesWorld, ArthurPSmith, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
