The argument above is about automatically copying over content from other projects. My point is that the license isn't the problem with it, but that there is a problem with it.
Sven On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Gregor Hagedorn <[email protected]>wrote: > On 15 November 2012 23:35, Sven <[email protected]> wrote: > > Automatically copying over infoboxes is something I don't advise. Unlike > current infoboxes, which are rarely sourced, every point of data on > Wikidata should be DIRECTLY and INDIVIDUALLY sourced. We can use the same > source 37 times, but each bit of information that would ordinarily have a > field on an infobox needs to have its own source, we can't just say > "everything on this page is from XXXX". If we do automatic importing, it's > going to be an uphill battle from day one to source things. > > (The argument above is independent of licensing, so this should > perhaps be discussed in a separate thread?) > > Gregor > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
