Regarding the construction phases complex type that you want you have a couple 
of options. Properties support lists of values, so you could split the type 
into multiple properties and give a list of values for each. Then when 
qualifiers are added you could add a date range qualifier to each value to 
specify the phase or just use string qualifiers that say "phase 1", "phase 2", 
etc. depending on how detailed the information is. You can also group the 
properties in their own item. So you could create an item called "Potaissa 
phase 1 construction details" and then have construction phase just be a list 
of those specific items, which themselves contain the information.

Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:55:18 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] A data model for Roman forts (castra)

I would say this is a good starting point. The Wikidata data model is described 
in full detail here [1], and a introductory primer is given here [2]. 
Qualifiers are not implemented yet, but will be there soon, and followed by 
more datatypes (like time, geo, etc.).

The major difference is that values like "stone" for material or 
"opus-quadratum" for technique should not be strings - this does not translate 
well. They should be pointing to items, e.g. Q8063 instead of "stone" and 
Q2631941 instead of "opus-quadratum".

The other thing is that Wikidata does not really intend to enable constraints 
in that very strong sense that your schema chooses. So if someone wants to add 
a value for material that you did not preconceive, like Q40861 (Marble), 
Wikidata-as-a-software will not stop them from doing so (just as 
Wikipedia-as-a-software does not stop you from entering that, either) (see also 
[3]).

I hope this helps,Denny

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Data_model
[2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer[3] 
http://blog.wikimedia.de/2013/02/22/restricting-the-world/



2013/3/27 Flaviu <[email protected]>


  
    
  
  
    I fully agree with you that the XSD
      model cannot by precisely integrated into Wikidata and also I know
      Wikidata development is in progress. I think I could deal with
      simple properties like "material" but I'm not sure how to deal
      with complex properties like "construction phases" I'm not sure.
      Even if it is no implementation yet, how these complex properties
      could be defined?

      

      On 03/26/2013 11:53 PM, Michael Hale wrote:

    
    
      
      You can't integrate the XSD model precisely as it
        is defined because Wikidata doesn't allow all of the constraints
        that XSD allows. Specifically, you'll notice that you can't
        force an item to have a specific property (like the document or
        epigraphic reference in your model) and enumerations aren't
        currently supported. Wikidata has a global collection of
        properties and any item can use any arbitrary subset of them.
        The list is here: 
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties.
        Some of the ones you want already exist, like material used for
        a building. http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P186 You'll
        want to propose the other ones you want here: 
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal.
        I just added two statements (when you use a property, called a
        claim without references) to the Potaissa item that you use as
        an example. http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7234612

        

        > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:50:52 +0200

          > From: [email protected]

          > To: [email protected]

          > Subject: [Wikidata-l] A data model for Roman forts
          (castra)

          > 

          > Hi all,

          > 

          > I recently attended "Wikidata meets archeology" symposium
          and I came 

          > across the question how a well structured and
          comprehensive data model 

          > of Roman forts (castra) could be integrated into Wikidata
          and then used 

          > on Wikipedia. For this I developed a raw XSD model based
          on the data 

          > model of Wikipedia's Infobox castrum. I put this model on
          the talk page 

          > of Q88205 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q88205)
          adding also a 

          > simple example. I would like to know this data model
          could be integrated 

          > into Wikidata? It is feasible? Is it too complex?

          > 

          > Thank you,

          > Saturnian

          > 

          > _______________________________________________

          > Wikidata-l mailing list

          > [email protected]

          > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

        
      
      

      
      

      _______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

    
    

  


_______________________________________________

Wikidata-l mailing list

[email protected]

https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l




-- 
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de


Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. 
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der 
Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für 
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.


_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l                         
                  
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to