It's OK if we have a way to represent the information in another way.
Reasonator plays kind of fine with this, it's enough to make him aware of
the "official name" to treat it differently. The name to display is a
contextful information, and anyway it needs special ways to treat the
information and select the context and the data to display, so it''s not
really a problem.


2014-03-06 17:21 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:

> Hoi,
> When data is to be shown in the context of history, the appropriate label
> is to be shown, is to be found. It is as complex as what we do with
> statements.
>
> The point is very much that when you state that when labels are not
> intended to convey "complex" information, the intention is debatable. It is
> arguably wrong.
> Thanks,
>       GerardM
>
>
> On 6 March 2014 17:15, Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Am 06.03.2014 17:12, schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
>> > Hoi,
>> > So how do I indicate that up to a particular date Jakarta was called
>> Batavia ?
>> > Muhammed Ali was called Cassius Clay ? There is no discussion about it.
>> All
>> > there is an (potentially perceived) inability to use appropriate labels
>> at will.
>>
>> Create a property for "official name" and make staements. Labels are
>> there for
>> display and search. They are not intended to convey complex information.
>>
>> -- daniel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kinzler
>> Senior Software Developer
>>
>> Wikimedia Deutschland
>> Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to