Hoi,
The argument that one day an article might be written is not really
relevant in a Wikidata context. Having relevant items in Wikidata is valid
as long as it complies with the notability requirements of Wikidata.
One of the requirements is an article.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 16 October 2014 10:09, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> On 15 October 2014 13:22, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Wikidata is NOT Wikipedia driven so the notion of redirects
>
> Perhaps not, but I have just created Q18289539, about thw BBC's new
> 'Genome' online database:
>
> http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/
>
> I have also created:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Genome
>
> as a redirect to:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Times#Digitisation
>
> "Radio Times" already has a separate Wikdiata entry.
>
> There is a logical equivalence between Q18289539 and /BBC_Genome, but
> not between Q18289539 and /Radio_Times, nor /Radio_Times#Digitisation
>
> I should like to add a sitelink to /BBC_Genome, to Q18289539, not
> least because one day, somebody might turn that redirect into an
> article; or add categories to it.
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
