Hi Bene, Yes, I have played with a few of the SPARQL endpoints. Interesting things sometimes do popup excitedly unexpected. I like those. But many assumptions have to be made in certain corner cases. But that why I have a brain, to make my own internal DAG whenever I need. :)
ALL, Thanks for those additional suggestions and tips on filtering claims/statements. Thad +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Bene* <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thad > > Freebase simply decided to not keep Wikipedia topic pages that simply >> held "lists of entities", but instead Freebase liked to easily generate >> those same "lists of entities" by using queries. There was no need to have >> hand coded lists in Freebase. It was a graph database and could generate >> all kinds of lists programmaticlly for a user, and keep those lists as >> views against our user profile for easy tweaking or re-use when we wanted >> to. (stored user queries) >> > > We also plan to have "Query" entities once (in a dedicated namespace). > They will be equivalent to current Wikipedia List articles but will be > generated automatically by some kind of (SPARQL?) query. [1] > > What we might consider is adding sitelinks to those entities as well and > allow linking to Wikipedia pages that use this Query. This way we would > still be able to serve Wikipedia's needs of linking corresponding pages on > different sites while they are in a place where they semantically make > sense and don't conflict with "real" items. > > Best regards > Bene > > [1] > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Glossary#Entities.2C_items.2C_properties_and_queries > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
