Il 30/ago/2015 05:30, "Yongmin Hong" <li...@revi.pe.kr> ha scritto: > That does not cover all 7** wikis in WMF wikifarm. (Well yeah, some projects have wd not enabled, e.g. meta.) TBH I don't like the attempt to workaround things by js. It should be implemented in the Wikibase to allow +2~ sitelinks so this long-standing dispute can be buried into the realm of historical discussions.
Am I the only one that thinks that jheald's .js is a temporary solution? Am I the only one that actually appreciate his attempt at solving a *practical* problem by providing a *practical* solution, while we wait for a long-term, stable solution? I'd like to remember everyone, me included, that the Wikidata team has lots of irons into fire at the moment, and that they cannot take them all out at the same moment. They're good, but not apt to miracles - as none of us is, AFAIK. So, unless someone has the means to actually solve this problem on the technical side, we'll have to wait and, while we're waiting, put up something that will reduce the inconvenience in the meantime. Since I don't have too much connection here, I'll reserve for another post a couple of examples of why making 2+ sitelinks for item available it's just a terrible, terrible idea, and I'll go straight to the point: why don't we make the .js a part of the common.js and make it work properly until things are fixed? L.
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
