On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Michael Peel <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems to assume a default uncertainty on values, though: I just added > the elevation above sea level to: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1513315 > just specifying the central value, and it assumes that this value is +- > 0.1 km - which isn't a good assumption to make... > Did you mean to write 2.80 km about sea level? Then the error would be 0.01 km .... I am guessing the uncertainty follows the scientific notation of the number... 2.8 has the numeric uncertainty of (about) +/- 0.1... That sounds like a reasonable approach to me... Egon -- E.L. Willighagen Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
