Hoi,
Nitpicking.. I do not have a Wikipedia account, I have multiple all
together in a SUL account.

When a discussion takes place you effectively kill it by saying: nanana
this is where I will not react and read it. I have a phabricator account
and it is not as convenient as good old mail.

Some insist on Phabricator, some on Meta, Mail, Wikidata.. The point is
that we want that discussion. When you insist on concentrating, you get
situations where you are blamed for the choices you make. Choices that may
be unfortunate. And you will complain: but I told you that the discussion
was at Phabricator....
Thanks.
     GerardM

On 20 September 2015 at 21:13, Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Am 20.09.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
> > Hoi,
> > It is certainly one way to exclude many people who might be interested.
>
> Focusing a discussion in one place is a bad thing? I find it rather
> problematic
> if conversations are scattered across several places. It makes it easy to
> miss
> half of it, especially when trying to read up later.
>
> You are welcome to keep this list in sync with the phabricator ticket if
> you
> think it's important. I suggest to make a separate threat with a meaningful
> subject line for that.
>
> BTW: I think you can sign into phabricator using your wikipedia account.
> That
> should allow most interrested people to particupate without having to
> create a
> new account. I'm not quite sure of the details though.
>
> --
> Daniel Kinzler
> Senior Software Developer
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland
> Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to