Content created by this tools is licensed under CC-BY v4.0. I made it explicit now :)
Best On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:11 PM Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote: > Amir, > Thanks for your work! I like this one showing how our Sum-of-all-Paintings > project is doing compared to sculptures (which have many copyright issues, > but you could still put the data on Wikidata) > http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=p31&q=Q3305213%7CQ860861 > > Jane > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey, >> Thanks for your feedback. That's exactly what I'm looking for. >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM Paul Houle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's a step in the right direction, but it took a very long time to >>> load on my computer. >>> >> It's maybe related to labs recent issues. Now I get reasonable time: >> http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/eq1i3s/http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php >> >>> >>> After the initial load, it was pretty peppy, then I ran the default >>> example that is grayed in but not active (I had to retype it) >>> >> >> I made some modifications that might help; >> >>> Then I get the page that says "results are ready" and how cool they are, >>> then it takes me a while to figure out what I am looking at and finally >>> realize it is a comparison of data quality metrics (which I think are all >>> fact counts) between all of the P31 predicates and the Q5. >>> >> I made some changes so you can see things easier. I appreciate if you >> suggest some words I put in the description; >> >> >>> The use of the graphic on the first row complicated this for me. >>> >>> Please sugest something I write there for people :); >> >>> There are a lot of broken links on this page too such as >>> >>> http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/sitelink.php >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/P31 >>> >> >> The property broken should be fixed by now and sitelink is broken because >> It's not there yet. I'll make it very soon; >> >>> >>> >>> and of course no merged in documentation about what P31 and Q5 are. >>> Opaque identifiers are necessary for your project, but >>> >>> Also some way to find the P's and Q's hooked up to this would be most >>> welcome. >>> >>> Done, Now we have label for everything; >> >>> It's a great start and is completely in the right direction but it could >>> take many sprints of improvement. >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gerard Meijssen < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hoi, >>>> What would be nice is to have an option to understand progress from one >>>> dump to the next like you can with the Statistics by Magnus. Magnus also >>>> has data on sources but this is more global. >>>> Thanks, >>>> GerardM >>>> >>>> On 8 December 2015 at 21:41, Markus Krötzsch < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Amir, >>>>> >>>>> Very nice, thanks! I like the general approach of having a stand-alone >>>>> tool for analysing the data, and maybe pointing you to issues. Like a >>>>> dashboard for Wikidata editors. >>>>> >>>>> What backend technology are you using to produce these results? Is >>>>> this live data or dumped data? One could also get those numbers from the >>>>> SPARQL endpoint, but performance might be problematic (since you compute >>>>> averages over all items; a custom approach would of course be much faster >>>>> but then you have the data update problem). >>>>> >>>>> An obvious feature request would be to display entity ids as links to >>>>> the appropriate page, and maybe with their labels (in a language of your >>>>> choice). >>>>> >>>>> But overall very nice. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Markus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 08.12.2015 18:48, Amir Ladsgroup wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey, >>>>>> There has been several discussion regarding quality of information in >>>>>> Wikidata. I wanted to work on quality of wikidata but we don't have >>>>>> any >>>>>> source of good information to see where we are ahead and where we are >>>>>> behind. So I thought the best thing I can do is to make something to >>>>>> show people how exactly sourced our data is with details. So here we >>>>>> have *http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php* >>>>>> >>>>>> You can give only a property (let's say P31) and it gives you the four >>>>>> most used values + analyze of sources and quality in overall (check >>>>>> this >>>>>> out <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P31>) >>>>>> and then you can see about ~33% of them are sources which 29.1% of >>>>>> them are based on Wikipedia. >>>>>> You can give a property and multiple values you want. Let's say you >>>>>> want >>>>>> to compare P27:Q183 (Country of citizenship: Germany) and P27:Q30 (US) >>>>>> Check this out >>>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P27&q=Q30|Q183>. And >>>>>> you can see US biographies are more abundant (300K over 200K) but >>>>>> German >>>>>> biographies are more descriptive (3.8 description per item over 3.2 >>>>>> description over item) >>>>>> >>>>>> One important note: Compare P31:Q5 (a trivial statement) 46% of them >>>>>> are >>>>>> not sourced at all and 49% of them are based on Wikipedia **but* *get >>>>>> this statistics for population properties (P1082 >>>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P1082>) It's not a >>>>>> trivial statement and we need to be careful about them. It turns out >>>>>> there are slightly more than one reference per statement and only 4% >>>>>> of >>>>>> them are based on Wikipedia. So we can relax and enjoy these >>>>>> highly-sourced data. >>>>>> >>>>>> Requests: >>>>>> >>>>>> * Please tell me whether do you want this tool at all >>>>>> * Please suggest more ways to analyze and catch unsourced materials >>>>>> >>>>>> Future plan (if you agree to keep using this tool): >>>>>> >>>>>> * Support more datatypes (e.g. date of birth based on year, >>>>>> coordinates) >>>>>> * Sitelink-based and reference-based analysis (to check how much of >>>>>> articles of, let's say, Chinese Wikipedia are unsourced) >>>>>> >>>>>> * Free-style analysis: There is a database for this tool that can be >>>>>> used for way more applications. You can get the most unsourced >>>>>> statements of P31 and then you can go to fix them. I'm trying to >>>>>> build a playground for this kind of tasks) >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope you like this and rock on! >>>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P136&q=Q11399> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Wikidata mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wikidata mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikidata mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Paul Houle >>> >>> *Applying Schemas for Natural Language Processing, Distributed Systems, >>> Classification and Text Mining and Data Lakes* >>> >>> (607) 539 6254 paul.houle on Skype [email protected] >>> >>> :BaseKB -- Query Freebase Data With SPARQL >>> http://basekb.com/gold/ >>> >>> Legal Entity Identifier Lookup >>> https://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup/ >>> <http://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup/> >>> >>> Join our Data Lakes group on LinkedIn >>> https://www.linkedin.com/grp/home?gid=8267275 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
