Hoi,
What is achieved in this way and, on what basis can you license the output
of a tool?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 16 December 2015 at 12:58, Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]> wrote:
> Content created by this tools is licensed under CC-BY v4.0. I made it
> explicit now :)
>
> Best
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:11 PM Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Amir,
>> Thanks for your work! I like this one showing how our
>> Sum-of-all-Paintings project is doing compared to sculptures (which have
>> many copyright issues, but you could still put the data on Wikidata)
>> http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=p31&q=Q3305213%7CQ860861
>>
>> Jane
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>> Thanks for your feedback. That's exactly what I'm looking for.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM Paul Houle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's a step in the right direction, but it took a very long time to
>>>> load on my computer.
>>>>
>>> It's maybe related to labs recent issues. Now I get reasonable time:
>>> http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/eq1i3s/http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php
>>>
>>>>
>>>> After the initial load, it was pretty peppy, then I ran the default
>>>> example that is grayed in but not active (I had to retype it)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I made some modifications that might help;
>>>
>>>> Then I get the page that says "results are ready" and how cool they
>>>> are, then it takes me a while to figure out what I am looking at and
>>>> finally realize it is a comparison of data quality metrics (which I think
>>>> are all fact counts) between all of the P31 predicates and the Q5.
>>>>
>>> I made some changes so you can see things easier. I appreciate if you
>>> suggest some words I put in the description;
>>>
>>>
>>>> The use of the graphic on the first row complicated this for me.
>>>>
>>>> Please sugest something I write there for people :);
>>>
>>>> There are a lot of broken links on this page too such as
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/sitelink.php
>>>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/P31
>>>>
>>>
>>> The property broken should be fixed by now and sitelink is broken
>>> because It's not there yet. I'll make it very soon;
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and of course no merged in documentation about what P31 and Q5 are.
>>>> Opaque identifiers are necessary for your project, but
>>>>
>>>> Also some way to find the P's and Q's hooked up to this would be most
>>>> welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Done, Now we have label for everything;
>>>
>>>> It's a great start and is completely in the right direction but it
>>>> could take many sprints of improvement.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gerard Meijssen <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hoi,
>>>>> What would be nice is to have an option to understand progress from
>>>>> one dump to the next like you can with the Statistics by Magnus. Magnus
>>>>> also has data on sources but this is more global.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> GerardM
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8 December 2015 at 21:41, Markus Krötzsch <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Amir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very nice, thanks! I like the general approach of having a
>>>>>> stand-alone tool for analysing the data, and maybe pointing you to
>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>> Like a dashboard for Wikidata editors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What backend technology are you using to produce these results? Is
>>>>>> this live data or dumped data? One could also get those numbers from the
>>>>>> SPARQL endpoint, but performance might be problematic (since you compute
>>>>>> averages over all items; a custom approach would of course be much faster
>>>>>> but then you have the data update problem).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An obvious feature request would be to display entity ids as links to
>>>>>> the appropriate page, and maybe with their labels (in a language of your
>>>>>> choice).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But overall very nice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08.12.2015 18:48, Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>> There has been several discussion regarding quality of information in
>>>>>>> Wikidata. I wanted to work on quality of wikidata but we don't have
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> source of good information to see where we are ahead and where we are
>>>>>>> behind. So I thought the best thing I can do is to make something to
>>>>>>> show people how exactly sourced our data is with details. So here we
>>>>>>> have *http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can give only a property (let's say P31) and it gives you the
>>>>>>> four
>>>>>>> most used values + analyze of sources and quality in overall (check
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> out <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P31>)
>>>>>>> and then you can see about ~33% of them are sources which 29.1% of
>>>>>>> them are based on Wikipedia.
>>>>>>> You can give a property and multiple values you want. Let's say you
>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>> to compare P27:Q183 (Country of citizenship: Germany) and P27:Q30
>>>>>>> (US)
>>>>>>> Check this out
>>>>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P27&q=Q30|Q183>.
>>>>>>> And
>>>>>>> you can see US biographies are more abundant (300K over 200K) but
>>>>>>> German
>>>>>>> biographies are more descriptive (3.8 description per item over 3.2
>>>>>>> description over item)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One important note: Compare P31:Q5 (a trivial statement) 46% of them
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> not sourced at all and 49% of them are based on Wikipedia **but* *get
>>>>>>> this statistics for population properties (P1082
>>>>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P1082>) It's not a
>>>>>>> trivial statement and we need to be careful about them. It turns out
>>>>>>> there are slightly more than one reference per statement and only 4%
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> them are based on Wikipedia. So we can relax and enjoy these
>>>>>>> highly-sourced data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Requests:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Please tell me whether do you want this tool at all
>>>>>>> * Please suggest more ways to analyze and catch unsourced materials
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Future plan (if you agree to keep using this tool):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Support more datatypes (e.g. date of birth based on year,
>>>>>>> coordinates)
>>>>>>> * Sitelink-based and reference-based analysis (to check how much of
>>>>>>> articles of, let's say, Chinese Wikipedia are unsourced)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Free-style analysis: There is a database for this tool that can
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> used for way more applications. You can get the most unsourced
>>>>>>> statements of P31 and then you can go to fix them. I'm trying to
>>>>>>> build a playground for this kind of tasks)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope you like this and rock on!
>>>>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P136&q=Q11399>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Paul Houle
>>>>
>>>> *Applying Schemas for Natural Language Processing, Distributed Systems,
>>>> Classification and Text Mining and Data Lakes*
>>>>
>>>> (607) 539 6254 paul.houle on Skype [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> :BaseKB -- Query Freebase Data With SPARQL
>>>> http://basekb.com/gold/
>>>>
>>>> Legal Entity Identifier Lookup
>>>> https://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup/
>>>> <http://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup/>
>>>>
>>>> Join our Data Lakes group on LinkedIn
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/grp/home?gid=8267275
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
