On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> > I don't see why it is an issue that some external identifiers don't
> > translate to URIs. What complex logic is involved here? In RDF we should
> > just add the plain identifier like we have it now as the default value,
>
> If we say "since external IDs are in fact URIs, since they refer to
> external databases, then let's mark them as URI property and render them
> as full URI - i.e. let's instead of:
>
> wd:Q1000336 wdt:P646 "/m/03pvzn"
>
> say this:
>
> wd:Q1000336 wdt:P646 <https://www.freebase.com/m/03pvzn>
>
> This may make a lot of sense, since the interesting URL that people
> would like to see may be the latter, and the former is kind of
> chopped-off form of it we use for our internal purposes. OTOH, what if
> it wasn't easy or possible to generate the latter from the former
> automatically? Then we need some logic to figure that out.


>From a machine processing point of view, a more interesting statement is
probably:

    wd:Q1000336 owl:sameAs <https://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.03pvzn
<https://www.freebase.com/m/03pvzn>>

This is supposed to redirect to either RDF
https://rdf.freebase.com/rdf/m.03pvzn <https://www.freebase.com/m/03pvzn> or
HTML https://www.freebase.com/m/03pvzn based on content negotiation, but
that seems to be broken right now and it always returns RDF.

Tom
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to