Why would that be a problem? Disagreement between authoritative resources/ontologies is not uncommon. I would argue that as long as the references to the disagreeing resources are properly set it is for the user to decide which external resource to believe.
Just curious, but which disease is not considered a disease in DSM-5? Cheers, Andra On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > > When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 > says it is not. There is a huge problem. > > When something is not what it is said to be. Should we allow for things > that are diametrical the opposite of each other. The problem is that labels > like this have a massive impact. When they are manifestly wrong should we > include them because an external ontology says so? > Thanks, > GerardM > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
