On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 > says it is not. There is a huge problem.
How is DSM-5 not an ontology itself? Why is this a huge problem? Isn't this just two sources that contradict each other? Moreover, I am even tempted to say it's not even a formal contradiction; it's just different definitions of something which is hard to define... More interestingly would be: should Wikidata have separate items for both? Egon -- E.L. Willighagen Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
