Uh, I leave the details to someone who knows better :) - it is a while since I checked, and it might indeed be underspecified right now.
To the best of my knowledge, there is only one widely used coordinate system for each Mars and Titan. I might be wrong. But in the worst case we would need to specify the default system for either. I am not saying that the whole thing is not a problem - I am just saying that the data model, as spec'ed and implemented, has a space for solving it. It is obvious that without support in the UI the whole thing is slightly moot anyway. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:23 PM Jan Macura <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2016-10-07 20:34 GMT+02:00 Denny Vrandečić <[email protected]>: > > Wikidata allows to set a coordinate system - it is called a globe or > coordinate system - on every coordinate. This would be the natural place to > specify whether it is WGS84 or GDA94 or another system. Most of them are > Q2, which, as per data model, is indeed WGS84 > > > Hi Denny, > > can you be more specific about this? So when there is no explicit value in > the *globe* parametre of GlobeCoordinate, then it is treated as Q2 (this > corelates with the dumps and every RDF serialization)? It would imply > geographic coordinates (not the same as WGS84!!). Or is it considered to be > specifically WGS84, which is Q11902211? > And how you tell the coordinate system for other celestial bodies like > Q111 (Mars) or Q2565 (Titan)? > > Thanks a lot > Jan > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
