Thanks Yaroslav. I can see a brief discussion that seems to have happened month ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Twitter But the BLP that I edit have only started to be changed in the last couple of weeks. I still think this is very disingenuous to expect no responsibility or communication by and with Wikidata. Wikidata is becoming the host repository for this information now. Doesn't that "ownership" imply some sort of responsibility, interactively, with its sister projects. Especially the largest one, English Wikipedia? I have actually come over to the side of being convinced that Authority Control and datasets like Twitter are serviced well by Wikidata -- and support this process. But documentation and communication needs to be vastly improved so that both Wikidatans and Wikipedians know how the data is added, updated, etc. - Erika *Erika Herzog* Wikipedia *User:BrillLyle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrillLyle>* On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09.10.2016 19:46, Brill Lyle wrote: > >> So if this is not the place to discuss these issues, should I be going >> to the Wikipedia-l with them? Issues that directly relate to Wikidata? >> >> I would really appreciate some clarification on this. >> >> > Hi Erika, > > I guess the starting point would be to contact on-wiki (e.g. on the > English Wikipedia) the user who is removing the templates (or the bot > owner) and ask for the venue where the issue was discussed. If such venue > exists, I am pretty sure it is on Wikipedia. If this has not been > discussed, it probably needs to be stopped. > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
