Gerard, I am willing to help. What do you want explained? (We can perhaps move that off-list.)
Med vänliga hälsningar Jan Ainali http://ainali.com 2017-01-08 8:52 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: > Hoi, > What I mean and what I say is that there has been noone willing to explain > why certain items are in there. When you ask questions it is seen as a > threat and consequently I find I am treated like one. The consequence is > that I do not care about the structure and totally ignore it. This is a > shame because on occasion I do expect this has an impact. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 8 January 2017 at 00:15, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Markus Kroetzsch, 08/01/2017 00:12: >> >>> The subclass of and instance of statements are actually used in very >>> many WDQS queries, often with * expressions to navigate the hierarchy. >>> >> >> I think that's what Gerard meant: you don't have to know what's under the >> hood, as long as it works. When you get some unexpected result, you go >> check what went wrong in the chain of subclasses etc. This is at least what >> I do, although I also work with some more traditional people who want to >> know the full ontology before even entering their first statement (of >> course they get lost for a few months). >> >> Nemo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
