Dear André,
Great work you have done.
I am wondering whether you are aware of the issues around the Danish
dataset and the clean up apparently required.
As far as I can determine the German Wikipedia has had a number of
articles on Danish dolmens and they are also available on Wikidata. As
far as I can see these items have not been linked with the new Swedish
additions.
For instance, "Dolmen von Tornby" https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1269335
has no Danish ID but is probably one of these items:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30240926 and
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30240928 or
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30114892 or
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30114893 which the Alicia bot has added.
There are quite a lot of Danish dolmens on the German Wikipedia
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Gro%C3%9Fsteingrab_in_D%C3%A4nemark
I am sorry to present you with yet another problem. Perhaps the items
can be matched by the geo-coordinate.
best regards
Finn
On 08/04/2017 04:57 PM, André Costa wrote:
Hi all!
As part of the Connected Open Heritage project Wikimedia Sverige have
been migrating Wiki Loves Monuments datasets from Wikipedias to Wikidata.
In the course of doing this we keep a note of the data which we fail to
migrate. For each of these left-over bits we know which item and which
property it belongs to as well as the source field and language from the
Wikipedia list. An example would e.g. be a "type of building" field
where we could not match the text to an item on Wikidata but know that
the target property is P31.
We have created dumps of these (such as
https://tools.wmflabs.org/coh/_total_se-ship_new.json, don't worry this
one is tiny) but are now looking for an easy way for users to consume them.
Does anyone know of a tool which could do this today? The Wikidata game
only allows (AFAIK) for yes/no/skip whereas you would here want
something like <enter_value>/invalid/skip. And if not are there any
tools which with a bit of forking could be made to do it?
We have only published a few dumps but there are more to come. I would
also imagine that this, or a similar, format could be useful for other
imports/template harvests where some fields are more easily handled by
humans.
Any thoughts and suggestions are welcome.
Cheers,
André
André Costa |Senior Developer, Wikimedia Sverige
|andre.co...@wikimedia.se <mailto:andre.co...@wikimedia.se>
|+46 (0)733-964574
Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige.
Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se <http://blimedlem.wikimedia.se/>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
