Hi!

> For one reason...There are already tons of public LIDAR datasets with
> point data down to millimeter.
> I've even seen monuments and public art sculptures that have LIDAR
> datasets down to millimeter precision using WGS84 base references.

OK, but:
1. For objects we store in wikidata, what exactly is known with this
precision? E.g., if you have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5577191 -
which part of it the coordinate specifies up to millimeter? That is a
big monument, lots of possibilities. No way to know.
2. For objects we store in wikidata, this is probably not stable - even
if we somehow defined that the point we know up to millimeter is the tip
of Schiller's nose in Q5577191 - that probably would change with weather
conditions, erosion, ground shifts, continental drift (on millimeter
scale, that becomes relevant), etc.
3. For any practical use - such as querying - having data for one statue
only with millimeter accuracy is useless, to really do some calculation
where it matters all statues (or at least all statues, say, in New York
- or at least most of them) should have such accuracy. That obviously
won't be the case.

For this reasons, I don't think millimeter accuracy would ever be
relevant for Wikidata.

> Having it all queryable in Wikidata ?  hmmm... not for me, other data
> catalogs and GIS systems handle that job.

Exactly.

-- 
Stas Malyshev
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to