On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:39 AM Guillaume Lederrey <[email protected]> wrote: > I've created https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T258769 to track this request. Great, thanks for doing that. I've added an example query (https://tinyurl.com/y26mtate) of how things are currently done.
> It is unlikely that we'll be able to remove federation in this case. At least > it is unlikely that we'll merge those 2 graphs in a single Blazegraph > instance. Given the concerns we have about scaling this service, splitting > into more federated graphs seems a better option than merging into larger > graphs. There might be ways to pull a subset of the Wikidata dataset into > WCQS, but that looks like a complex problem. Yeah, I get that. I think it might be more interesting in the short-term to figure out how things can get easier in terms of adding some extra features in the query UX to make write federation SPARQL easier. -- Hay _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
