Hi there, I think Option 2 with relevant servers makes the most sense. We would be covered all the way for a while. The "sandboxed" wiki sounds like a great idea. Room to try. Even though I am not a coder or programmer, I like to keep an eye of what innovations are going on.
Thank you all. You have been great. Cheers, Patricia -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mackiwg Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:50 PM To: WikiEducator Subject: [WikiEducator] Re: An alternative hosting path Hi Brent & Randy Great to see that there is growing support for option 2 ..;-) Brent, - also thanks for your offer to assist with some of the technical support. (BTW have you talked to Wen lately?) Realistically we need to go with a minimum of a 2 server solution for Phase 2. At the moment we don't have a good enough fail-server solution in place. If server 1 goes down --- we've got nothing in place to ensure a 24/7 service. We do a daily data backup to another server -- so our data is safe should Server 1 burn out. I like the "sandboxed" wiki idea for experimental work and pushing the envelope. Innovation and a forward looking disposition are core values of the WE commmunity -- and in many respects differentiates our project from other wikis in the field. My vote is to explore 3 servers. (Don't tell my finance director just yet <smile>.) Wayne --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
