>Of course it would also mean increased
>  work load for all concerned.  One can't expect peers to review unless
>  one is also willing to serve as reviewer.

I recently heard/read about an automatic methods for  determining the
quality of a wikipedia article. An example using wikipedia content is
given at the link below

http://gaston.cse.ucsc.edu/index.php/Main_Page

More information can be found at:

http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/

Cheers
Rob

>
> >
>



-- 
Robert Kruhlak
Burnaby, BC
CANADA
(M) +1 778 230 1875
(E) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"WikiEducator" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to