;) well, I wouldn't object to that, its all open communication and info
sharing, not to mention building up Wayne's online
presence<http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=wayne+mackintosh>which
as we can see is owned by COL rather than Wayne himself.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Next you'll be suggesting twitter so we can keep up with his
> movements... geographic that is <SMILE>
>
> On Oct 2, 2:23 pm, "Leigh Blackall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wayne, you need a blog..
> >
> > All this information, dispersed and broken up inside a google group and
> > different Wikipages. I think you need a blog so we can keep up with
> > everything you are doing and thinking about
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 09:49 -0700, Steve Foerster wrote:
> >
> > > Wayne wrote:
> >
> > > << WikiEducator 3.0 refers to the phases of our strategic plan: >>
> >
> > > Oooooh, okay, fair enough.
> >
> > >  I've started a stub for Wkieducator 3.0 --- The idea being to provide
> a
> > > synopsis of our strategy and concise history of the project as the
> basis to
> > > ask the community to help us identify the strategic and operational
> > > priorities of Phase 3 in our development.
> >
> > >  << TImeline: Startup of the new International Center for Open
> > > Education is scheduled for 1 May 2009.  COL has agreed to fund the
> > > technical infrastructure of WIkiEducator for the first 3 years, that
> > > is servers and technical support staff. COL's future support for
> > > WikiEducator is conditional and requires that WikiEducator is
> > > established within a new legal framework that COL considers
> > > appropriate for such support.  Our discussions have been around
> > > setting up an independent and appropriate non-profit entity. >>
> >
> > > I agree that this is critically important.  In order to set up a non-
> > > profit organisation, it must have by-laws, yes?  And these would
> > > presumably refer to a governance structure, e.g., Board of Directors
> > > or Trustees or what have you?  I ask because if that's the case then
> > > this would effectively replace our Draft Policy on Governance, and if
> > > that's so we must be the ones to write it.
> >
> > >  Steve, replacing our Draft Policy on Governance -- not necessarily.
> >
> > > My personal view is that we should do everything we can to respect and
> > > support the autonomy of the WE community taking into account our
> history and
> > > what's been achieved to date and the legal requirements.  It is
> conceivable
> > > to have an independent non profit that is responsible for maintaining
> the
> > > technical and operational infrastructure of the WikiEducator community
> in
> > > accordance with the policies approved by the WikiEducator Community
> Council
> > > without interfering with the governance of the community.  I'm not a
> lawyer
> > > and we'll need to get legal advice on this question.  So let's wait
> till we
> > > have feedback from the experts.
> >
> > > << Steve the Open Education Centre comes under an employer - employee
> > > relationship. This is subject to the normal confidences afforded to
> > > employment agreements. >>
> >
> > > I hope that doesn't mean that you foresee your relationship with Otago
> > > would require confidences that would preclude you from sharing
> > > relevant information with the WE community.
> >
> > >  Nope -- I don't see it that way at all.  We all have multiple roles
> and
> > > identities. My participation in WE is as an equal member of the WE
> family.
> > > For example, you work at a University -- but participate in WE as a
> member
> > > of the community. What I anticipate is a job description which gives me
> the
> > > time to work for the WikiEducator project as an organisational
> allocation of
> > > staff time. Increasingly, I hope to see more institutions officially
> > > donating FTE (Full time equivalent) staff time to the project. I've
> been
> > > thinking about launching an FTE for WikiEducator initiative where
> > > institutions commit real staff time to the project.
> >
> > > << The moment I have definitive detail on the relationship between the
> > > operations of the International Centre for Open Education and the
> > > WikiEducator project -- I will be the first to let our community know.
> >
> > > Fair enough.
> >
> > > << Suffice it to say, the establishment of an independent legal entity
> > > for administering the funding for the WE project is a critical path
> > > decision for moving forward.  Currently -- WE has no legal status. WE
> > > is a community of association whereby individual members are
> > > personally responsible (and liable) for their activities in the
> > > community. >>
> >
> > > Very good, on this I think everyone agrees.  Can we assume the non-
> > > profit group would be chartered in NZ?  (Fine with me if it is, so
> > > long as NZ recognises public domain dedications.)
> >
> > >  Yes -- the non-profit would be chartered in NZ. To the best of my
> knowledge, NZ recognises public domain dedications.
> >
> > > The final form of the non-profit is not my decision, nor should it be.
> This
> > > has to do with taxation status of different kinds of entities, for
> example
> > > an Educational Charitable Trust versus a non-profit company with
> charitable
> > > purposes.  In the case of NZ Educational Trust, to retain "tax free"
> status
> > > has implications regarding disbursements -- this has nothing to do with
> the
> > > form of the entity but local taxation law. As an international project
> we
> > > must ensure that WE can continue its work at an international level.
>  This
> > > international stuff gets pretty complicated -- our server sits in
> Germany
> > > and we will more than likely have our Phase 2 hosting located in
> Canada.
> > > Each country has its laws around these things as well. I'm not a lawyer
> and
> > > we will rely on the advice of legal professionals working in the field.
> > > There is also the question of legal liability of the organisation that
> funds
> > > operations etc. So lots of detail that needs to be worked out.
> >
> > >  << I have always acted in the best interests of the WIkiEducator
> > > project. I hold the highest number of edits in the community and the
> > > accolade of being the first member of WikiEducator :-).  Since the
> > > inception of the project I have always put community first and will
> > > continue to do so. >>
> >
> > > I know.  I really hope you don't think that I'm asking you these
> > > questions because of any doubt of that, as for the record I have none
> > > at all.  And hopefully everyone understands that you can't know
> > > everything yet.  I'm only bugging you this way because I want to
> > > ensure that the community is as involved as possible in what happens
> > > to us, and you can't reasonably facilitate that if we don't do our
> > > part by asking what we need to know.
> >
> > >  I respect and admire your approach and ongoing commitment to our
> project
> > > since the early days :-) --- keep bugging!
> >
> > > Cheers
> > > Wayne
> >
> > >  -=Steve=-
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Leigh Blackall+64(0)21736539
> > skype - leigh_blackall
> > SL - Leroy Goalposthttp://learnonline.wordpress.comhttp://
> www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall
> >
>


-- 
--
Leigh Blackall
+64(0)21736539
skype - leigh_blackall
SL - Leroy Goalpost
http://learnonline.wordpress.com
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to