On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:41 +1300, Leigh Blackall wrote:

> As for instructional design... this is the very reason I personally
> would appose the idea of using Wikieducator to develop text books,
> because we would see pedagogical templates and "activities"
> frustrating the information. IMO pedagogical activity should be kept
> separate from text books so as to allow teachers and learners the
> freedom to design their own processes around the content. This was
> Teemu Leinonen's argument back when we were discussing the development
> of the OER Handbooks.


Leigh, the experience, research and published literature from Open
Distance Learning field does not support these propositions -- Here you
may want to consult the work of Derek Rowntree, Lockwood and others.
There is pretty conclusive research evidence supporting the integration
of learning activities in asynchronous learning texts.

BTW -- Like David, I was researching and writing about pedagogical
re-usability in the 90's -- and although I hate to admit this, I was
engaged in the early days of Computer Assisted Learning and our mistaken
premises around congruence theory that computers were the panacea to
matching learning styles with teaching styles. The big mistake we were
making with that early research fad was the fact that teaching/learning
is not simply a dyadic relationship -- we were forgetting about the
demands of the learning task (content) and the huge potential associated
with Metalearning. 

In this regard  -- I rather like Ronald Reagan's philosophy  ---  "There
is no limit to the good you can do if you don't care who gets the
credit"

Cheers
Wayne

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to