Neillie -

On point 1 below would the glossary be order like this "addition
(whole number)" or "whole number (addition)" ? The later is the way
publishers produce their materials; while the former is the way a
problem solvers would be looking for information. Any thoughts?

Jim Kelly

On Dec 31 2008, 3:43 pm, Wayne <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nellie -
>
> Wow that was fast!!!
>
> Thinking out loud here .... From my perspective a WikiEducator glossary
> should:
>
> 1. Define/describe the concepts we typically use in our community
> discussions, eg "free content", "community values" etc.
> 2. For me a glossary is a short description of the concepts we use
> rather than an alternate navigation system for finding content resources
> in the wiki.
>
> So I'm thinking that we should:
>
> 1. Think about criteria that would qualify listing of a concept within
> the glossaries emerging on the site -- wow this is a hot development
> idea gaining traction on WE!
> 2. Decide on a uniform layout for glossaries.
>
> For example in the Math glossary it seems that the following layout is
> emerging:
>
> * Definition
> * Alternate definitions
> * Examples
> * Links
>
> See for example:
>
> http://www.wikieducator.org/MathGloss/G/Graph
>
> In the case of the WikiEducator glossary, I've been playing with the
> following layout:
>
> * Description
> * Clarifying questions
> *  Links
>
> See for example:
>
> http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator/Glossary/F/Free_content
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers
> Wayne
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 16:22 -0700, NELLIE DEUTSCH wrote:
> > Thank you, Wayne,
> > Here is my contribution to the New Year:
> >http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator/Glossary/E
> > Warm wishes,
> > Nellie Deutsch
> > Doctoral Student
> > Educational Leadership
> > Curriculum and Instruction
> >http://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C19
> >http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller
> > skype:nelliedeutschmuller
>
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Wayne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >         Hi Nellie --
>
> >         No worries :-). I've made a humble start describing the
> >         following terms:
>
> >         Values (http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator/Glossary/V)
> >         and
> >         Free content
> >         (http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator/Glossary/F)
>
> >         Still very much work in progress and WE still have lots of
> >         work to do.
>
> >         If you have any suggestions for concepts which you feel should
> >         be included in the glossary --- just add them under the
> >         appropriate letter. You'll see an example of the syntax for
> >         adding concepts here:
>
> >        
> > http://www.wikieducator.org/index.php?title=WikiEducator/Glossary/F&a...
>
> >         I think the WE glossary resource will be a valuable resource
> >         --- it's certainly going to save me a lot of time when
> >         responding to all the email queries I get on a daily basis.
> >         Pretty soon I'll be able to point folk to a link on the site
> >         and become more productive :-).
>
> >         Cheers
> >         Wayne
>
> >         On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 15:58 -0700, NELLIE DEUTSCH wrote:
>
> >         > Wayne,
> >         > I would love to start using it as soon as it is available,
> >         > is what I meant to say.
> >         > Happy 2009!!!
> >         > Warm wishes,
> >         > Nellie Deutsch
> >         > Doctoral Student
> >         > Educational Leadership
> >         > Curriculum and Instruction
> >         >http://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C19
> >         >http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller
> >         > skype:nelliedeutschmuller
>
> >         > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Wayne <[email protected]>
> >         > wrote:
>
> >         >         Hi Nellie --
>
> >         >         Its a wiki -- go for it :-)
>
> >         >         I believe you can start populating the glossary
> >         >         here:
>
> >         >        http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator/Glossary
>
> >         >         Cheers
> >         >         Wayne
>
> >         >         On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 13:53 -0700, NELLIE DEUTSCH
> >         >         wrote:
>
> >         >         > Randy,
> >         >         > Is the glossary ready for me to use?
> >         >         > Warm wishes,
> >         >         > Nellie Deutsch
> >         >         > Doctoral Student
> >         >         > Educational Leadership
> >         >         > Curriculum and Instruction
> >         >         >http://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C19
> >         >         >http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller
> >         >         > skype:nelliedeutschmuller
>
> >         >         > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Randy Fisher
> >         >         > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >         >         >         Hi All,
>
> >         >         >         I think that there are multiple
> >         >         >         motivations as to why one might want to
> >         >         >         consider developing a glossary.
>
> >         >         >         That being said, it's high time that we
> >         >         >         had a place where some of the terms used
> >         >         >         (er, thrown around) in WikiEducator, have
> >         >         >         a place for 'definition'.
>
> >         >         >        http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator/Glossary
>
> >         >         >         As we go merrily along (er, lurch and
> >         >         >         fall), perhaps these definitions can be
> >         >         >         inserted into this new home....
>
> >         >         >         - Randy
>
> >         >         >         On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Leigh
> >         >         >         Blackall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >         >         >                http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikijunior
>
> >         >         >                 On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:36 AM,
> >         >         >                 jkelly952
> >         >         >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >         >         >                         To design a useful
> >         >         >                         dictionary and one that
> >         >         >                         can be a platform (no
> >         >         >                         quotes) for developing
> >         >         >                         materials you need to
> >         >         >                         consider the age level of
> >         >         >                         the learner (as you
> >         >         >                         noted). While the word
> >         >         >                         "triangle" is used on
> >         >         >                         every
> >         >         >                         age level's math learning
> >         >         >                         materials, its meaning
> >         >         >                         progressively changes
> >         >         >                         as the learner ages.  To
> >         >         >                         develop mathematics
> >         >         >                         programs lists of terms
> >         >         >                         by age group need to be
> >         >         >                         developed and definitions
> >         >         >                         that match that
> >         >         >                         learner's world need to be
> >         >         >                         done.
>
> >         >         >                         For example in reviewing
> >         >         >                         textbook series over the
> >         >         >                         last 30 years in the
> >         >         >                         United States the average
> >         >         >                         5 year old (plus or minus
> >         >         >                         1 year) has
> >         >         >                         consistently been exposed
> >         >         >                         to 24 terms out of a list
> >         >         >                         of 78 terms that
> >         >         >                         have been used for that
> >         >         >                         age level.  Developing an
> >         >         >                         on line dictionary
> >         >         >                         by age level will help
> >         >         >                         many people. The teacher
> >         >         >                         (and parents) of a 5
> >         >         >                         year old will have a
> >         >         >                         resource; the material
> >         >         >                         developer will have a
> >         >         >                         resource; a language group
> >         >         >                         wanting to develop a math
> >         >         >                         program in their
> >         >         >                         language will have a
> >         >         >                         resource.
>
> >         >         >                         Jim Kelly
>
> >         >         >                         On Dec 30, 7:32 pm, Wayne
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to