Hi Alan, You raise a number of very pertinent points, particularly with reference to improving return on investment of expensive projects. Good post! This got me thinking about a few related issues:
- Imagine if all these "big money" projects released their outputs under free content licenses - - available for others to remix and improve for their own benefit. Individual projects (regional and local) don't stand to loose anything by sharing their outputs freely, yet the world has so much to gain from these experiences. - The distance education (DE) and open distance learning (ODL) approaches have gained a wealth of experience in producing high quality learning materials (most notably the team approach to course development) -- yet we have not succeed in translating these experiences for the OER model yet. Imagine the potential impact of distributed teams of content experts, learning designers, multimedia professionals, graphic designers and editors working collaboratively on OER resources the wiki way. - I think there are considerable learning opportunities for the OER movement to harness what we have learned from capability maturity models and "organisational growth" approaches (as you have alluded.) This is what I like about the wiki model -- irrespective of our "entry-level" skills, working in a live wiki environment we all grow through the apprenticeship model. For example, subject matter experts can improve their learning design skills by collaborating on open wiki collaborations. - I agree -- there is huge potential for expanding and scaling up low-cost OER models. For example, the OER Foundation and WikiEducator oversee the world's largest training project to develop wiki skills in education under the "Learning4Content" -- the model can easily be replicated for other areas in education -- for example, professional development of education staff, developing and teaching courses using OER. We've started early work identifying projects like this under the CollabOERate intiative -- (see: http://wikieducator.org/OERF:CollabOERate) -- Still early days, but we've made a start identifying four strategic projects so far. So much to do ..... As I said in an earlier post -- working together we can achieve far more than working alone. What are the next steps? How do we make these futures happen? What can the OER Foundation do to move these agendas forward internationally? All help and support is gladly received. Cheers Wayne On 19 May 2010 12:19, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi to all contributing to this discussion, > I've been away and only just started catching up with the topic. I > find myself agreeing with just about every thing that has been said. > Finding a balance between the different modalities and the context is > critical for education in the developing world. It also presents > massive challenges for developed countries such as Australia with a > large indigenous population grossly underrepresented in tertiary, > secondary and primary education. Huge amounts of funding have gone > into intervention programs resulting in contested outcomes, for both > health and education, depending on whose side of the arguments you are > hearing concerning intervention strategies. A research project > currently underway by COL called EduFrame > http://www.eduframe.net/eduframe/default.htm > is yet another attempt at providing low cost technology to learners. > Despite all the developments over the past 20 years in De and Online > web based approaches to teaching and learning its still the middle > class that takes advantage of these developments and gaining > acceptance by minority groups in mainstream populations represents a > major hurdle. Perhaps David. Cavallo’s 2004 paper on organisational > growth, "Models of growth – Towards fundamental change in learning > environments" > http://web.media.mit.edu/~walter/bttj/Paper11Pages96-112.pdf<http://web.media.mit.edu/%7Ewalter/bttj/Paper11Pages96-112.pdf> > represents an approach to engage with the disadvantage in both > developed and underdeveloped worlds. > Cheers, > Alan. > > On May 18, 2:30 pm, "Jan Visser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Wayne, for that great contribution. I particularly value your > > closing line! > > > > Jan > > > > _____ > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Wayne Mackintosh > > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:28 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Re: Teachers Without Borders (TWB) > > > > Hi Jan, Simon, Valerie and Ed. > > > > This is not a trivial challenge. > > > > On one hand, I agree with Sagata Mitra that " the most advanced > educational > > technology should go first to the most disadvantaged learners. Any > advantage > > to such a learner would be a benefit." The impact and potential of > > multi-mode, multimedia learning should not be underestimated.The fact > that > > we now have netbooks which, in many cases cheaper than standard published > > textbooks is a phenomenal achievement. In one sense -- posting a CDROM is > > broadband connectivity and a mechanism to provide access to rich media > media > > learning experiences. > > > > On the other hand, like Jan, I have spent the majority of my career > working > > in education /ICTs for development. While $75 -- $100 may not seem to be > a > > large sum of money. Putting this in the context of low income countries, > the > > cost equates to the gross per capita income of 3 to 6 months wages -- > > depending on where you live and what gainful employment (if any) you may > > have :-(. In Kenya, for example, the cost of sending one child to a > > government funded secondary school equates to approximately 33% of the > > average per capita income for the country. I have three children and I > would > > not be able to afford spending 67% of my gross income to pay for my > > children's education -- no money left for housing or food. > > > > It seems to me that we should focus energies on building sustainable OER > > ecosystems - and I think there are a few "preconditions" that will > nurture > > the growth of these ecosystems. > > > > * A commitment to free cultural works licensing > > (www.freedomdefined.org) -- specifically with regards to free file > formats > > because this will facilitate remix and reconfiguration of Free content > for > > delivery across multiple delivery technologies, i.e. print, low cost > > netbooks, mobile devices etc. > > * Granting users the freedom to use technologies in ways that make > > sense for them -- I've always been fascinated by the innovative social > use > > of technology in Sub-Saharan Africa. I recall a survey I ran in South > Africa > > in the early 1990s with the students registered for a first year > university > > course in education. At the time this was the largest course at Unisa > with > > 12000 registered students! 75% of the respondents did not have > electricity > > at home (taking into account that this was an elite group who had the > > opportunity to study at tertiary level.) However, the majority had access > to > > radio but surprisingly just over 50% having access to television at home > > (running of batteries). That was 20 year ago .... but its easy to make > > wrong assumptions with reference to how technologies may or may not be > used. > > > > * Radically improving content "interoperability" among OER > > repositories --- free content doesn't care where it resides. We can fuel > > real innovation by making the remix easier. > > * Other "pre-conditions" to nurture the growth of sustainable OER > > ecosystems? > > > > Working together we can achieve far more than working alone. > > > > Cheers > > Wayne > > > > On 18 May 2010 06:15, Jan Visser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes, I surely agree, and I think it's what I said in different words. > While > > we continue to do the things we all feel we must do, though we realize > they > > are insufficient (I engage in them myself as much as Ed and Valerie and > > probably most others on this list do), my call was indeed to be at the > same > > time observant, inquiring and critically reflective (i.e. the true > meaning > > of being skeptical as you rightly observe). Far from damping our > enthusiasm, > > it should make us more determined and allow us to focus on the right > action, > > collaboratively working on multiple fronts. > > > > Jan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > > > > On Behalf Of simonfj > > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:33 PM > > To: WikiEducator > > Subject: [WikiEducator] Re: Teachers Without Borders (TWB) > > > > Gee Jan, > > > > I feel a sceptic in our midst, and thank you for it. That said i would > > > > never like to dampen the enthusiasm Ed shows. (I'd forgive any number > > > > of words for the passion Valerie and Ed display). > > > > But OK, we know that; > > > > 1. 'education', in points around the world, requires all sorts of > > > > compromises. > > > > 2. One dimension in anything displays a limited perspective. And > > > > 3. the "western culture of the industrial era" is a fair cop for most > > > > of us. > > > > We look around our world and would like to think those in less > > > > favourable gobal points might gain the same advantages. (although the > > > > talk of 'delivering resources' in education makes my hairs stand up). > > > > Not being a teacher, all I ever hope for anyone is that they can get > > > > their questions answered, in full, when they ask; so they can get on > > > > and improve their personal situation. > > > > A formal education is a pretty hard thing to consider when the > > > > priorities in lots of places are water, then food, then electricity > > > > and eventually all the goodies which plug into a network. But your > > > > comment "the problem is immensely more complex than what is imagined" > > > > simply fills me with pity. We all know this, which is what inspires > > > > our passions to do a bit, or not. > > > > The "not", it seems, is what happens so often by "the end" of a > > > > western education. i.e. talk & talk & talk > > > > Thank goodness for the WE's and TWB's of this world. > > > > On May 17, 10:25 am, "Jan Visser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ed, you wrote, in response to the assertion that "Printed material is > of > > greater value to a participant because she can take it home" the > following: > > "That is true without one-to-one, 24/7 computing. With it, software is of > > greater value to children than textbooks, because it includes multimedia, > is > > of much greater capacity, and can be provided at no cost and with the > > freedom to modify it and share the results. In addition, computers and > > software are now essential subjects for schools. Not so-called "Computer > > Literacy" but computer mastery." > > > > > I beg to differ with both positions. Your claim, I think, is assuming > too > > much for the moment as far as the potential impact of computing > technology > > is concerned, and I am saying so inspired by the more than 40 years I've > > been working (and living for more than half that time) in countries > deprived > > of even the most basic resources like, in the school context, something > that > > could function as a blackboard and a piece of chalk, or even a decent > piece > > of stone or wood to sit on while in class (not necessarily under a roof > or > > complemented with something that could resemble a desk), let alone > materials > > with which to engage in collaborative activities with one's fellow > learners > > for, say, the purpose of exploring and understanding the workings of > nature. > > Doing one's homework at home may be less dependent on having a computer > or a > > book than on having the kind of home that minimally resembles the > dwellings > > you and I live in (not to speak of the homes of the likes of > Schwarzenegger, > > McChrystal and McCain) and particularly on having economic conditions > that > > don't put you as a child in charge of all kinds of tasks that must > > necessarily be performed to sustain the life of the family and that > heavily > > interfere with fruitful participation in a regular school environment. > > > > > Of course, I'm all for the great and important things you and others > are > > pursuing, but I'm afraid there are no silver bullets. The solutions to > > improving the quality of human learning around the world in diverse > > circumstances and multiple cultural contexts are complex because learning > is > > a complex phenomenon. One-to-one computing is possibly part of the > solution > > to reshaping the learning landscape, enabling all to learn, but so are > > books, TWB, WE and a host of other things. None of them will do the job > > alone and much will depend on co-evolving contextual factors. One of the > > important lessons I've learned is that it usually stifles the creativity > if > > we focus too strongly on just one dimension of the problem. > > > > > And, while I am at it, let's not forget that there is an enormous > wealth > > of learning beyond formal schooling whereas most of the efforts, > including > > our own in WE, continue to be inspired by the predominant school > metaphor, > > which is strongly rooted in the western culture of the industrial era. We > > really need to broaden our thinking beyond the perspectives that follow > from > > our primary inclinations. > > > > > I'm sorry to paint a less satisfying picture, but, with due respect to > the > > efforts of TWB (whose coming into being and growth I have followed since > my > > first contacts back in the 1990's with its founder Fred Mednick), and > fully > > recognizing the valuable intentions of those involved in making > one-to-one > > computing a reality, as well as with deep appreciation for the work of > those > > engaging in producing print or screen based text and other software, I'm > > afraid we are only scratching the surface of a problem that is immensely > > more complex than what is imagined. > > > > > Jan > > > > > -- > > > > > Jan Visser, Ph.D. > > > > > President & Sr. Researcher, Learning Development Institute > > > > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > > Check out:http://www.learndev.organdhttp://www.facebook.com/learndev > > > > > Blog:http://jvisser-ldi.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Edward Cherlin > > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 11:10 PM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: [WikiEducator] Re: > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "WikiEducator" group. > To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org > To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D. Director, International Centre for Open Education, Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand. Board of Directors, OER Foundation. Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org Mobile +64 21 2436 380 User Page: http://wikieducator.org/User:Mackiwg Skype: WGMNZ1 Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
