Thanks simonfj,
I am trying to compile content so that for the potential virtual
institute stakeholders have a starting point in such a wide world of
jargon paradoxes
Ravi Limaye

On Dec 23, 3:25 am, simonfj <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ravi,
>
> I should point out one thing. In UK/Nth Europe and cross Atlantic, they
> talk about Virtual OrganiZations (VO) The Z is important if you're
> Googling. This is mainly used for Research Orgs. But as we see Research
> communities reach out to include their communities of interest, there' s a
> continuous change in the way both share the same networks and
> applications/services. LIGO's a good 
> example<http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/laac/>of attaching a virtual classroom to 
> the research community's hub.
>
> So far as an Indian-based (real) organisation in the education space,
> Educomp <http://www.educomp.com/Products/EducompOnline.aspx>, the owners of
> WiZiQ, are probably the most influential on the subcontinent. I'm pointing
> you at their new(ish) turnkey solution page. Obviously there are real
> tensions between publicly funded, and private owned, educational
> institutions in all countries. In India it seems the private ones are
> compensating very well  for the degeneration of the public institutions.
> (It's easier to address individual markets than change institutional
> behaviours.)
>
> There is every shade of grey in the approaches between public (OERu)
> initiatives  and the private (turnkey) offerings. I'm not sure how you can
> include a VO's *philosophy* in "the issues" but it seems to be one issue
> which is always glossed over in the public arena, and unnecessary in a
> private one.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to